[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505CE638.1030405@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:12:08 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linda Wang <lwang@...hat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86: Supervisor Mode Access Prevention
On 09/21/2012 03:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Have you tested kexec in this environment?
>
> This is the kind of cpu feature that when we enable it, frequently we
> have to do something on the kexec path.
>
> At a quick skim it looks like the kexec path is using kernel page table
> entries and clearing all bits from cr4 except X86_CR4_PAE so I don't
> actually expect this change will require anything on the kexec path.
>
I have not, no, but as you quite correctly point out that shouldn't
affect things.
We should also change the kernel to start clean with CR4 -- the purpose
of CR4 is to indicate which CPU features the OS is opting into.
I think we do on x86-64 but not on x86-32 at the moment.
This is an unrelated problem, though, and can be addressed later.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists