linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] do not disable sg when packet requires no checksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:32:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ecashin@...aid.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	jesse@...ira.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] do not disable sg when packet requires no checksum

From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:46:07 -0700

> This two-part patchset replaces an earlier net-only patch that
> added an explicit check for the AoE protocol to harmonize_features
> in net/core/dev.c.
> 
> Following the suggestions of Ben Hutchings, this patchset makes
> the decision in the network layer protocol agnostic instead of
> using ETH_P_AOE as a special case.  It relies on fresh skbs being
> CHECKSUM_NONE but makes that explicit with an assertion.
> 
> Ed L. Cashin (2):
>   aoe: assert AoE packets marked as requiring no checksum
>   net: do not disable sg for packets requiring no checksum

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Ed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/