[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120922152139.GA26808@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:21:39 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:55:28PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 1) I don't see anything disabling kdb or kgdb. If ever there
> was a way to poke into the kernel and change things...
Is there any way to access them without having physical console access
(either the system console or a serial console)? Physically-present
attacks are kind of out of scope here.
> 2) You almost certainly want to disable module removal. It is all to
> easy to have races where that are not properly handled in the module
> removal path. I know I saw a bundle of those in debugfs the other
> day.
I'm pretty reluctant to work around bugs like this. Disabling features
certainly reduces the attack surface, but the aim is to only disable
features that *by design* permit the modification of the kernel. Where
it's possible to do so by exploiting bugs, we should be fixing the bugs.
> 3) And half seriously you probably want to disable mounting of
> filesystems. I believe I have heard it said the kernel has not been
> vetted against a hostile root user mounting deliberately corrupted
> filesystem images.
See (2). Not that you need to be root to trigger filesystem mounts, so
this is also a user->kernel exploit. Those should be fixed.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists