linux-kernel - Re: Drop support to compressed modules?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201209221408.23355.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:08:21 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Dave Reisner <d@...conindy.com>
Subject: Re: Drop support to compressed modules?

On Friday 21 September 2012 17:41:44 Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> I'd like to ask people the following question: why are you using
> compressed modules? Is it only for the disk space or is there any
> performance related reason?

i've only seen it to save on disk space
-mike

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)