lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120922.155255.396667016733201083.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	subramanian.vijay@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: use a per task frag allocator

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:11:11 +0200

> On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 13:27 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
>> I get the following compile error with the newer version of the patch
>> 
>> net/sched/em_meta.c: In function ‘meta_int_sk_sendmsg_off’:
>> net/sched/em_meta.c:464: error: ‘struct sock’ has no member named
>> ‘sk_sndmsg_off’
>> make[1]: *** [net/sched/em_meta.o] Error 1
>> make: *** [net/sched/em_meta.o] Error 2
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Vijay
> 
> Oh well, I wonder what's the expected use of this crap...
> 
> Thanks, I'll fix this on v3 !

So many aspects of the meta match are an extreme burdon on development
because the keys it allows unnecessarily exposes internals of our
implementation.

Who really uses it?  Maybe we can schedule it for removal.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ