[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120922.155255.396667016733201083.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: subramanian.vijay@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: use a per task frag allocator
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:11:11 +0200
> On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 13:27 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
>> I get the following compile error with the newer version of the patch
>>
>> net/sched/em_meta.c: In function ‘meta_int_sk_sendmsg_off’:
>> net/sched/em_meta.c:464: error: ‘struct sock’ has no member named
>> ‘sk_sndmsg_off’
>> make[1]: *** [net/sched/em_meta.o] Error 1
>> make: *** [net/sched/em_meta.o] Error 2
>>
>>
>>
>> Vijay
>
> Oh well, I wonder what's the expected use of this crap...
>
> Thanks, I'll fix this on v3 !
So many aspects of the meta match are an extreme burdon on development
because the keys it allows unnecessarily exposes internals of our
implementation.
Who really uses it? Maybe we can schedule it for removal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists