linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] tty: Add get- ioctls to fetch tty status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120922200731.GD14004@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:07:31 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC] tty: Add get- ioctls to fetch tty status

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:06:39PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:25:07PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:54:01 +0400
> > Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:51:31PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > +static int pty_get_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, int __user *arg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	int locked = test_bit(TTY_PTY_LOCK, &tty->flags);
> > > > > +	if (put_user(locked, arg))
> > > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > 
> > > > Now explain exactly how this doesn't race with another thread chanigng
> > > > the lock setting ?
> > > 
> > > It's the same as to set/clear this bit, isn't it? Please correct me
> > > if I'm wrong.
> > 
> > So by the time you've finished the test bit and returned it to user space
> > the answer may have changed ?
> > 
> > > > The other comment I have is that it might be better put these in now
> > > > there are sysfs patches for the tty layer bouncing about to provide the
> > > > needed infrastructure ?
> > > 
> > > Alan, could you please point me where these patches are living, so I would
> > > take a look and check them out
> > 
> > linux-serial or check tty-next as I think Greg has now merged the test
> > patch.
> 
> Guys, you mean something like below? Look, I must admit I'm not really
> sure if I've done all locking right, and there is no need for additional
> kref counting on tty_struct. Could you please check if it looks more-less
> sane (I've tested it but still...)
> 
> ---
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> Subject: tty, pty: Add pty_state attribute to fetch tty flags
> 
> For checkpoint/restore we need to know if tty has
> exclusive or packet mode set, as well as if pty
> is currently locked (just to be able to restore
> this characteristics).
> 
> To serve this the pty_state attribute is introduced
> for pty devices. A typical output looks like
> 
>  | [root@...tune ~]# cat /sys/devices/virtual/tty/ptmp0/pty_state
>  | locked: 0 exclusive: 0 packet: 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> CC: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
> CC: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/pty.c |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: tty.git/drivers/tty/pty.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tty.git.orig/drivers/tty/pty.c
> +++ tty.git/drivers/tty/pty.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,46 @@ done:
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t pty_show_state(struct device *dev,
> +			      struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			      char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct tty_struct *tty = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int locked, exclusive, packet;
> +
> +	tty_lock(tty);
> +	locked = test_bit(TTY_PTY_LOCK, &tty->flags);
> +	exclusive = test_bit(TTY_EXCLUSIVE, &tty->flags);
> +	packet = tty->packet;
> +	tty_unlock(tty);
> +
> +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "locked: %d exclusive: %d packet: %d\n",
> +			locked, exclusive, packet);
> +}

Sysfs is one value per file, you have three values here, please make 3
files.

And document them in Documentation/ABI/.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/