[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505D9DFB.8080002@westnet.com.au>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:16:11 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@...tnet.com.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
>> Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
>> branch.
>>
>> Mark Salter (3):
>> c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
>> c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve
>> c6x: switch to generic sys_execve
>
> Applied and pushed...
>
> FWIW, the current status:
>
> alpha - done, tested on hardware
> arm - done, tested on qemu
> c6x - done by maintainer
> frv - done, untested
> m68k - done, tested on aranym; there's a known issue in copy_thread() in
> case of coldfire-MMU, presumably to be handled in m68k tree (I can do it
> in this one instead, if m68k folks would prefer it that way)
I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
if you would rather take it with your changes.
Regards
Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists