[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1tzk4g64cx.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:22:54 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@...gle.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>, vda.linux@...glemail.com
Cc: hughd@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...izon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] lib: vsprintf: Optimize division by 10 for small integers.
On Fri, Aug 03 2012, George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com> wrote:
> Shrink the reciprocal approximations used in put_dec_full4
> based on the comments in put_dec_full9.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Have you verified that the comment is correct?
> ---
> lib/vsprintf.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> I was looking over the code and noticed that the constants could be smaller.
>
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index c3f36d41..2f32fe8 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -243,13 +243,14 @@ char *put_dec(char *buf, unsigned long long n)
>
> /* Second algorithm: valid only for 64-bit long longs */
>
> +/* See comment in put_dec_full9 for choice of constants */
> static noinline_for_stack
> char *put_dec_full4(char *buf, unsigned q)
> {
> unsigned r;
> - r = (q * 0xcccd) >> 19;
> + r = (q * 0xccd) >> 15;
> *buf++ = (q - 10 * r) + '0';
> - q = (r * 0x199a) >> 16;
> + q = (r * 0xcd) >> 11;
> *buf++ = (r - 10 * q) + '0';
> r = (q * 0xcd) >> 11;
If you are changing everything, this could also be changed to:
r = (q * 0x67) >> 10;
no?
> *buf++ = (q - 10 * r) + '0';
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@...gle.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists