[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87txuo3abb.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:42:32 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] devpts: fix devpts mount behavior
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> On 09/22/2012 08:47 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Making /dev/ptmx a symlink sounds simple, but in practice no one could
>> actually figure out how to make it happen.
>
> This feels particularly ridiculous since udev now requires devtmpfs
> (as in it will no longer work without it), which means this is all
> done in the kernel, so we should just be able to fix this in the
> kernel.
Some versions of udev require devtmpfs. At best we could have something
conditional in the kernel that does this.
> Greg, Kay, any idea how to make ptmx show up in devtmpfs as a symlink
> to pts/pmtx instead of as a device node?
The conversation stalled in January with that very question.
What I am proposing doesn't conflict with any effort like that.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists