[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505E8F44.9020208@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:25:40 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: hpa@...or.com, initramfs@...r.kernel.org, robert.moore@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
yinghai@...nel.org, eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net, vojcek@...n.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: Override arbitrary ACPI tables via initrd for
debugging
> +config ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE
> + bool
> + default y
Do distros in addition to SuSE concur they want to ship this way?
The last time we tried to make debugging easier we added
ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD, which allowed root to over-ride an AML method
on a running system. Distro security-minded people were not amused.
thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
ps I noticed your reference to acpidump in the README.
That reminded me to push it to the kernel source tree.
Its new home will be tools/power/acpi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists