[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pq5d441o.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:00:19 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] devpts: Make the newinstance option historical
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:30:38AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:59:04PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> > The test:
>> > >> + if (filp->f_vfsmnt->mnt_root == filp->f_dentry)
>> > kicks in and no redirection is performed.
>>
>> Umm... OK, after the first round of recursion. Unless you bind /something/pts
>> on /something.
>
> Other way round, of course... E.g.
> mount --bind /dev /dev/pts
> mount --bind /dev /dev/pts/pts
> etc. enough times to overflow the kernel stack on recursion.
Except of course I gave the wrong explanation.
I did the open with O_PATH. Since O_PATH never calls open recursion
is impossible.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists