[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50603338.5060608@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:47:28 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-numa@...r.kernel.org, wency@...fujitsu.com,
mingo@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update sched_domains_numa_masks when new cpus are onlined.
On 09/24/2012 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:27 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 09/24/2012 03:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> + hotcpu_notifier(sched_domains_numa_masks_update, CPU_PRI_SCHED_ACTIVE);
>>>> hotcpu_notifier(cpuset_cpu_active, CPU_PRI_CPUSET_ACTIVE);
>>>> hotcpu_notifier(cpuset_cpu_inactive, CPU_PRI_CPUSET_INACTIVE);
>>>
>>> OK, so you really want your notifier to run before cpuset_cpu_active
>>> because otherwise you get that crash, yet you fail with the whole order
>>> thing.. You should not _ever_ rely on registration order.
>>>
>>
>> IMHO he isn't relying on registration order.. He uses the CPU_PRI_SCHED_ACTIVE
>> priority to ensure that the ordering of callbacks is right, isn't it?
>
> Oh argh indeed. I can't read :/
>
;-)
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists