[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50603D02.50302@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:29:14 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@...tnet.com.au>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
On Sunday 23 September 2012 06:16 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:16:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
>>
>> I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
>> if you would rather take it with your changes.
>
> Applied. Other changes since the last update:
> * ppc breakage debugged and fixed
> * kernel_thread() unified on all converted architectures.
commit cc615abcde (mn10300: convert to generic kernel_thread) in the
experimental-kernel_thread has a minor syntactical error:
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
index 26120a9..8ee09d8 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->thread.usp = c_usp;
if (unlikely(!kregs)) {
- memset(c_regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs);
+ memset(c_regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists