[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348489478.11847.55.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:24:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] console: implement lockdep support for
console_lock
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 01:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > - In the printk code there's a special trylock, only used to kick off
> > the logbuffer printk'ing in console_unlock. But all that happens
> > while lockdep is disable (since printk does a few other evil
> > tricks). So no issue there, either.
>
> Not particularly evil, just plain broken.
>
> See this series:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132446644123326&w=2
>
> In particular see patches 1-4. The problem with lockdep is that lockdep
> uses printk and printk's recursion stuff is utterly broken.
>
> Console drivers being on crack simply doesn't help :-) Note that I would
> never recommend drm/ksm to anybody who really cares about their console
> output.
Also, don't cross-post with a subscribe only list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists