linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] console: implement lockdep support for console

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:17 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] console: implement lockdep support for
 console_lock

On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:54 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've read through the patches and I'm hoping you don't volunteer me to
> pick these up ... ;-) 

Worth a try, right? :-)

> But there doesn't seem to be anything that would
> get worse through this lockdep annotation patch, right? 

No indeed, your patch looks fine, I just wanted to comment on the
printk() thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/