[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120924135614.24704.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Date: 24 Sep 2012 09:56:14 -0400
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To: linux@...izon.com, mpn@...gle.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com
Cc: hughd@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] lib: vsprintf: Optimize division by 10000
Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@...gle.com> wrote:
> Didn't some SPARCs have 32x32->32 multiply? I remember reading some
> rant from a GMP developer about how SPARC is broken that way.
SPARCv9 only has 64x64->64; there's no 128-bit result version.
That cuts large-integer math speed by a factor of 4 (very
crude approximation), to the same speed as 32x32->64.
SPARCv8 UMUL puts the high half of the 64-bit result into the Y
register, and SPARCv7 has a multiply-step instruction (MULScc) which
does likewise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists