[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348501868.6991.230.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:51:08 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to
3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Anyway, does anybody have any clue as to why AMD and Intel machine
> behave significantly different here? Does an Intel box with HT disabled
> behave similar to AMD? or is it something about the micro-architecture?
If you mean pgbench, it should act about the same on both. As soon as
pgbench starts using significant CPU and has to compete, it'll start
having trouble.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists