[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000139f95ba955-a9faffde-33d6-420c-97ee-5dd7f728ef9b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:38:17 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"<devel@...nvz.org>" <devel@...nvz.org>,
"<linux-mm@...ck.org>" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/16] consider a memcg parameter in
kmem_create_cache
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > So Christoph is proposing that the new caches appear somewhere under
> > the cgroups directory and /proc/slabinfo includes aggregated counts,
> > right? I'm certainly OK with that.
> >
> Just for clarification, I am not sure about the aggregate counts -
> although it surely makes sense.
>
> Christoph, is that what you're proposing ?
Yes. Make it similar to the way /proc/meminfo is handled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists