[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120924185546.GJ16532@moon>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:55:46 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to
ARM)
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:16:09PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > > #else
> > > > +#define mmap_min_addr 0UL
> > > > #define dac_mmap_min_addr 0UL
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> >
> > I think better to add CONFIG_MMU test here.
>
> Well, my patch was just something quick to get the kernel to build, but
> thinking about it a bit, I still prefer it. The CONFIG_MMU check is in
> security.h already so I think it is less clutter and better for future
> code which may use mmap_min_addr. In any case, the compiler will drop
> any test for "x < 0UL" so the end result is the same.
Well, sure compiler should optimize it out but frankly i prefer #ifdef here.
Anyway, i'm cooking some new patch. Will post once it's ready and tested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists