[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a9wg53mc.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:36:27 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bfields@...ldses.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Ravishankar N <ravi.n1@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] fat: allocate persistent inode numbers
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
>
>>> What is problem if i_ino + i_generation is not match? I think, even if
>>> those didn't match, i_pos in FH should resolve issue, no?
>> No, It can not resolve issue.
>> in NFS file handle, there is a reference to the current inode number.
>> So, if by eviction that is changed - that it will results in "file id
>> changed" error.
>
> Who returns error?
This means - which code returns error?
>> even though using the i_pos we can reconstruct and get the INODE on
>> the Server, but the NFS handle is no more valid. As the inode number
>> is also changed, iunique() for the file will result in different
>> number this time.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists