linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:37:50 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com>
CC:	x86@...nel.org, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other
 functions call interrupts

On 09/20/2012 04:50 PM, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote:

>  	unsigned int irq_resched_count;
>  	unsigned int irq_call_count;
> +	/* irq_tlb_count is double-counted in irq_call_count, so it must be
> +	   subtracted from irq_call_count when displaying irq_call_count */
>  	unsigned int irq_tlb_count;


Review again this patch, above comments is not kernel compatible format.
Could you change it like standard comment format:

/*
 * xxxxxxx
 * xxxx
 */

-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/