linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/10] ARM: msm: Remove custom clk_set_{max,min}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5060E0A7.7090409@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:37:27 -0700
From:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] ARM: msm: Remove custom clk_set_{max,min}_rate()
 API

On 09/20/2012 07:26 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> There are no users of this API anymore so let's just remove it.
> If a need arises in the future we can extend the common clock API
> to handle it.
>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan<skannan@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd<sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c      |  9 +--------
>   arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c            | 12 ------------
>   arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/clk.h |  6 ------
>   3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c
> index 4886404..c4b34d7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c
> @@ -25,14 +25,7 @@ static int clock_debug_rate_set(void *data, u64 val)
>   	struct clk *clock = data;
>   	int ret;
>
> -	/* Only increases to max rate will succeed, but that's actually good
> -	 * for debugging purposes so we don't check for error. */
> -	if (clock->flags&  CLK_MAX)
> -		clk_set_max_rate(clock, val);
> -	if (clock->flags&  CLK_MIN)
> -		ret = clk_set_min_rate(clock, val);
> -	else
> -		ret = clk_set_rate(clock, val);
> +	ret = clk_set_rate(clock, val);

This was done to handle the difference in behavior of the remote 
processor on a per clock basis, but I agree that it's best to remove it 
now and added it back later if needed. And even if it's needed, I don't 
anticipate the need for changes to the common clock framework to deal 
with this.

Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>

-Saravana

>   	if (ret != 0)
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "clk_set%s_rate failed (%d)\n",
>   			(clock->flags&  CLK_MIN) ? "_min" : "", ret);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> index 5fac2df..8d07b25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock.c
> @@ -97,18 +97,6 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_round_rate);
>
> -int clk_set_min_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> -{
> -	return clk->ops->set_min_rate(clk->id, rate);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_set_min_rate);
> -
> -int clk_set_max_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> -{
> -	return clk->ops->set_max_rate(clk->id, rate);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_set_max_rate);
> -
>   int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
>   {
>   	return -ENOSYS;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/clk.h b/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/clk.h
> index 5f1c37d..fd4f4a7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/clk.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/clk.h
> @@ -25,12 +25,6 @@ enum clk_reset_action {
>
>   struct clk;
>
> -/* Rate is minimum clock rate in Hz */
> -int clk_set_min_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
> -
> -/* Rate is maximum clock rate in Hz */
> -int clk_set_max_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
> -
>   /* Assert/Deassert reset to a hardware block associated with a clock */
>   int clk_reset(struct clk *clk, enum clk_reset_action action);
>


-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/