[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120924230449.GA2040@psychosis.jim.sh>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:04:50 -0400
From: Jim Paris <jim@...n.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, neilb@...e.de,
vgoyal@...hat.com, "Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/26] block: Use bio_sectors() more consistently
Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Bunch of places in the code weren't using it where they could be -
> this'll reduce the size of the patch that puts bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx
> into a struct bvec_iter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> CC: "Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>
> CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
> CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> CC: Jim Paris <jim@...n.com>
> CC: Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>
> CC: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> CC: dm-devel@...hat.com
> CC: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/block/brd.c | 3 +--
> drivers/block/pktcdvd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/block/ps3vram.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-raid1.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/raid0.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 8 ++++----
> include/trace/events/block.h | 10 +++++-----
> 10 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ps3vram.c b/drivers/block/ps3vram.c
> index f58cdcf..1ff38e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ps3vram.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ps3vram.c
> @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static struct bio *ps3vram_do_bio(struct ps3_system_bus_device *dev,
> struct ps3vram_priv *priv = ps3_system_bus_get_drvdata(dev);
> int write = bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE;
> const char *op = write ? "write" : "read";
> - loff_t offset = bio->bi_sector << 9;
> + loff_t offset = bio_sectors(bio);
This doesn't look right to me: bio_sectors(bio) is (bio->bi_size>>9),
not (bio->bi_sector<<9~)?
-jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists