[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201209241958.33449.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:58:30 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] perf tools: bfd.h/libbfd detection fails with recent binutils
On Monday 24 September 2012 11:59:36 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
>
> - FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -lbfd
> + FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -DPACKAGE='perf' -
in this case, if you were to expand PACKAGE, you'd get back the symbol perf
(which most likely will be an error, but maybe it won't). i think this should
be instead:
-DPACKAGE='"perf"'
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
>
> +#define PACKAGE 'perf'
this isn't valid C anywhere. pretty sure this should be:
#define PACKAGE "perf"
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists