linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/30] perf tools: bfd.h/libbfd detection fails with recent binutils

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:58:30 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] perf tools: bfd.h/libbfd detection fails with recent binutils

On Monday 24 September 2012 11:59:36 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
>
> -		FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -lbfd
> +		FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -DPACKAGE='perf' -

in this case, if you were to expand PACKAGE, you'd get back the symbol perf 
(which most likely will be an error, but maybe it won't).  i think this should 
be instead:
	-DPACKAGE='"perf"'

> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
>
> +#define PACKAGE 'perf'

this isn't valid C anywhere.  pretty sure this should be:
	#define PACKAGE "perf"
-mike

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)