lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348557420.18425.0.camel@gitbox>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:14:15 +0000
From:	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
To:	"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the  tree

On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:37 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-uhci.txt between commit
> 100d45970327 ("ARM: vt8500: Add support for UHCI companion controller")
> from the usb tree and commit 95e9fd10f06c ("arm: vt8500: doc: Add device
> tree bindings for arch-vt8500 devices") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I used the version from the arm-soc tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
> 

Both versions were the same (my bad for not removing it from the arm-soc
patch).
Thanks Stephen

Regards

Tony P

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ