[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348537186.7100.16.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:39:46 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to
3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:12 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> >
> > Aside from the cache pollution I recall having been mentioned, on my
> > E5620, cross core is a tbench win over affine, cross thread is not.
>
> Oh, I agree with trying to avoid HT threads, the resource contention
> easily gets too bad.
>
> It's more a question of "if we have real cores with separate L1's but
> shared L2's, go with those first, before we start distributing it out
> to separate L2's".
Oh absolutely, if you have cores with shared L2, that's _the_ way to go,
shared L2 is lovely, and what select_idle_sibling() was originally all
about. Westmere manages to cough up a tbench win without that. Heck, I
generated some numbers for Borislav yesterday showing the thing winning
at _netperf TCP_RR_, one byte synchronous ping pong.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists