[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348573806.3881.35.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:50:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-numa@...r.kernel.org, wency@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update sched_domains_numa_masks when new cpus are
onlined.
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 19:45 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> Let's have an example here.
>
> sched_init_numa()
> {
> ...
> // A loop set sched_domains_numa_levels to level.-------------1
>
> // I set sched_domains_numa_levels to 0.
> sched_domains_numa_levels = 0;--------------------------------2
Ah, ok, so this 'idiot in a hurry' (aka. me) placed the hunk wrong and
thought it was at the start of the function.
> // A loop allocating memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[][]
> for (i = 0; i < level; i++) {
> ......
> // Allocate memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[i]----3
> ......
> }
> ......
>
> // I reset sched_domains_numa_levels to level.
> sched_domains_numa_levels = level;----------------------------4
> }
Yes this makes sense, it might be best to have this as a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists