linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50619C88.8000204@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:59:04 +0200
From:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	al viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints"

Op 25-09-12 13:29, Eric W. Biederman schreef:
> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com> writes:
>
>>> Could you try the following patch?  This should report what directories
>>> cannot be renamed because one of them is a mount point and it gives some
>>> real insight into what is going on.
>> ls /
>> __d_unalias: /dev -> /dev
>> __d_unalias: /proc -> /proc
>> __d_unalias: /sys -> /sys
> Ok.  That is what I thought was going on.  For some reason nfs is
> attempting to recreate an existing dentry.
>
> Does this fix the nfs problem for you?
>
> Eric
>
The patch seems to fix it, thanks!

~Maarten

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/