[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwe_LBm9bJ2FhjOq1Ae0hu7Sd4F4yZMMXd7BnSFu+RvAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:10:08 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to
3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>
> Ah. That's what I did to select_idle_sibling() in a nutshell, converted
> the problematic large L3 packages into multiple ~core2duo pairs, modulo
> shared L2 'course. Bounce proof, and on Westmere, the jabbering back
> and forth in L3 somehow doesn't hurt as much as expected, so the things
> act (more or less, L2 traffic _does_ matter;) like the real deal.
Right. But your patch *only* looked at the pair.
Which may be bounce-proof, but we also saw that it was unacceptable.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists