lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348546019.2457.3.camel@dabdike>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:06:59 +0400
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SCSI PATCH] sd: max-retries becomes configurable

On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c |    4 ++++
>  drivers/scsi/sd.h |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

I'm not opposed in principle to doing this (except that it should be a
sysfs parameter like all our other controls), but what's the reasoning
behind needing it changed?

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ