linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120925143931.f404ca22.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:39:31 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Richard Davies <richard@...chsys.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late
 as possible

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:13:27 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:

> I see. To me, your saying is better than current comment.
> I hope comment could be more explicit.
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index df01b4e..f1d2cc7 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -542,8 +542,9 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>                  * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
>                  * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
>                  * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> -                * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> -                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> +                * Check transhuge without lock and *skip* if it's either a
> +                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because it's not safe to call
> +                * compound_order.
>                  */
>                 if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
>                         if (!locked)

Going a bit further:

--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-acquire-the-zone-lru_lock-as-late-as-possible-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *
 		 * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
 		 * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
 		 * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
-		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
+		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because calling compound_order()
+		 * requires lru_lock to exclude isolation and splitting.
 		 */
 		if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
 			if (!locked)
_


but...  the requirement to hold lru_lock for compound_order() is news
to me.  It doesn't seem to be written down or explained anywhere, and
one wonders why the cheerily undocumented compound_lock() doesn't have
this effect.  What's going on here??

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/