linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:10:42 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 12:34 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> net/ipv4/raw.c between commit ab43ed8b7490 ("ipv4: raw: fix icmp_filter
> ()") from the net tree and commit 5640f7685831 ("net: use a per task frag
> allocator") from the net-next tree.
> 
> They are basically the same patch (for this file) except the net-next
> version adds two pr_err() calls. I used the net-next version and can carry
> the fix as necessary (no action is required).
> 
> I do wonder if this change belongs in the net-next patch?

Oops, my bad, net/ipv4/raw.c changes in 5640f7685831 ("net: use a per
task frag allocator") should not be there :

I accidentally left a debugging version of the patch I sent to fix the
icmp bug.

Sorry David for this, I am not sure how I can help on this ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/