linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: Ignore internal flags in cache creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Ignore internal flags in cache creation

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > No cache should ever pass those as a creation flags. We can just ignore
> > this bit if it happens to be passed (such as when duplicating a cache in
> > the kmem memcg patches)
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> 

Nack, this is already handled by CREATE_MASK in the mm/slab.c allocator; 
the flag extensions beyond those defined in the generic slab.h header are 
implementation defined.  It may be true that SLAB uses a bit only 
internally (and already protects it with a BUG_ON() in 
__kmem_cache_create()) but that doesn't mean other implementations can't 
use such a flag that would be a no-op on another allocator.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/