[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A18A318@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:23:42 +0000
From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: Clean the offlining CPU from the irq
affinity mask
> In that case, we would end up with an incorrect data->affinity right?
>
Moving the clean cpu mask code into if (chip->irq_set_affinity)?
Will resend the patch and will judge the chip->irq_set_affinity(data, affinity, true)
return value.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists