[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5062C215.8030602@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:21:33 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: Clean the offlining CPU from the irq affinity
mask
On 09/26/2012 01:40 PM, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
>> Btw, on a slightly different note, I'm also rather surprised that the above
>> code doesn't care about the return value of chip->irq_set_affinity() ..
>> Shouldn't we warn if that fails?
>
> It seems another case when irq_set_affinity is NULL whenever affinity is changed or not before that,
> For this case, I suppose the chip is not supporting set_affinity, then the chip should set all
> related irqs into just CPU0, otherwise, it will bring some trouble, do you agree?
>
Hmm.. no, I wouldn't jump to do that. Moreover, note that there are patches in -tip to
enable CPU 0 hotplug. So doing the above might not be terribly helpful going forward.
> I guess this case should be covered outside fixup_irqs() code.
>
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists