linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86, tsc: downgrade message for fast calibration failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1348654189.1664.12.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:09:49 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86, tsc: downgrade message for fast calibration failure

When fast calibration of the TSC fails an error is printed:
    tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed

This message was printed at default level (ie, as a warning) before
commit c767a54ba0657e52e6edaa97cbe0b0a8bf1c1655 ("x86/debug: Add
KERN_<LEVEL> to bare printks, convert printks to pr_<level>"). But it is
more appropriate to print it at informational level. If fast calibration
fails that only means an alternative calibration strategy will be tried,
and if that strategy also fails only a warning is printed. Besides,
there's nothing one can really do after noticing a fast calibration
failure.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
0) This is a rather verbose commit explanation. For trivialities like
these I try to write a very short explanation. But here the verbosity is
meant to obfuscate my complete ignorance of the (calibration of the)
TSC.

1) By the way, it's debatable whether this message should be printed at
informational or at notice level. But the difference between KERN_NOTICE
and KERN_INFO is too subtle for me. I even find the difference between
KERN_ALERT and KERN_CRIT, and between KERN_ERR and KERN_WARNING a bit
subtle. Are there guidelines for choosing between those levels?

 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index cfa5d4f..4f258ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static unsigned long quick_pit_calibrate(void)
 			goto success;
 		}
 	}
-	pr_err("Fast TSC calibration failed\n");
+	pr_info("Fast TSC calibration failed\n");
 	return 0;

 success:
-- 
1.7.11.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/