linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around old gas bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:29:29 +0800
From:	Tao Guo <glorioustao@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around old gas bug

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:28:22AM -0400, Tao Guo wrote:
>> gas in binutils(2.16.91) could not parse parentheses within macro
>> parameters unless fully parenthesized, and this is a workaround to
>> make old gas work without generating below errors:
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:387: Error: too many positional arguments
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:389: Error: too many positional arguments
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:390: Error: too many positional arguments
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:391: Error: too many positional arguments
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:392: Error: too many positional arguments
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:393: Error: too many positional arguments
>> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:394: Error: too many positional arguments
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Guo <glorioustao@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h |   48 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S     |   20 ++++++++--------
>>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> <formletter>
>
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> for how to do this properly.
>
> </formletter>

Thanks Greg, I just realized that I followed the old rules in an old
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt file. Since the patches for
other stable branches will be a little different from this one, I will
send them later to stable@...r.kernel.org after this patch gets
accepted.

Thanks,
-Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/