[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506279D3.5030702@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:43:15 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: rewrite the wrong annotation for select_task_rq_fair()
On 09/18/2012 04:16 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
> The annotation for select_task_rq_fair() is wrong since commit c88d5910, it's
> actually for a removed function.
>
> This patch rewrite the wrong annotation to make it correct.
Could I get some comments on this patch?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 6b800a1..35eb43a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2682,15 +2682,17 @@ done:
> }
>
> /*
> - * sched_balance_self: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
> - * that have the 'flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_FORK and
> - * SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
> + * select_task_rq_fair:
> + * Select a suitable CPU for task p, in order to keep load balance.
> *
> - * Balance, ie. select the least loaded group.
> + * sd_flag:
> + * the domain we try to balance should have "sd_flag" flag set.
> *
> - * Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
> + * wake_flags:
> + * indicate WF_SYNC.
> *
> - * preempt must be disabled.
> + * Must hold p->pi_lock and disable irq before invoke.
> + * Return the CPU number for task p to running on.
> */
> static int
> select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists