[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50636FF0.6010701@libero.it>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:13:20 +0200
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@...ero.it>
To: kreijack@...ind.it
CC: zwu.kernel@...il.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbacik@...ionio.com, dave@...os.cz,
linuxram@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs-progs: Fix up memory leakage
On 09/25/2012 07:14 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> I strongly disagree with this approach. The callee often don't know what
> happen after and before the call. The same is true for the programmer,
> because the code is quite often updated by several people. A clean
> exit() is the right thing to do as general rule.
My fingers were faster than my brain :-)
s/clean exit()/clean-up/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists