[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120926144219.bf4bfb9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:42:19 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] mm, util: Use dup_user to duplicate user memory
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:15:38 -0300
Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com> wrote:
> > This patch increases util.o's text size by 238 bytes. A larger kernel
> > with a worsened cache footprint.
> >
> > And we did this to get marginally improved tracing output? This sounds
> > like a bad tradeoff to me.
> >
>
> Mmm, that's bad tradeoff indeed.
> It's certainly odd since the patch shouldn't increase the text size
> *that* much.
> Is it too much to ask that you send your kernel config and gcc version.
x86_64 allmodconfig with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=n,
CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK=n. gcc-4.4.4.
> My compilation (x86 kernel in gcc 4.7.1) shows a kernel less bloated:
>
> $ readelf -s util-dup-user.o | grep dup_user
> 161: 00001c10 108 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 memdup_user
> 169: 00001df0 159 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 strndup_user
> $ readelf -s util.o | grep dup_user
> 161: 00001c10 108 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 memdup_user
> 169: 00001df0 98 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 strndup_user
>
> $ size util.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 18319 2077 0 20396 4fac util.o
> $ size util-dup-user.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 18367 2077 0 20444 4fdc util-dup-user.o
>
> Am I doing anything wrong?
Dunno - it could be a config thing.
> If you still feel this is unnecessary bloatness, perhaps I could think of
> something depending on CONFIG_TRACING (though I know
> we all hate those nasty ifdefs).
hm. Perhaps we could add an __always_inline_for_tracing. But that
wouldn't help a lot - a CONFIG_TRACING_SUPPORT=y kernel would still be
impacted even if the user is never using tracing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists