[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50637C24.90206@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:05:24 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] ARM: Move some macros from entry-armv to entry-header
On 09/24/12 14:27, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Just move the macros into header file as we would want to use them for
> KGDB FIQ entry code.
>
> The following macros were moved:
>
> - svc_entry
> - usr_entry
> - kuser_cmpxchg_check
> - vector_stub
>
> To make kuser_cmpxchg_check actually work across different files, we
> also have to make kuser_cmpxchg64_fixup global.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Why can't we put the fiq entry code from the next patch into
entry-armv.S? Sorry if this has been asked before but I don't see any
reasoning in the commit text.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists