[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120926162502.3b31071d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:25:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] binfmt_elf: Uninitialized variable
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:45:01 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> load_elf_interp has interp_map_addr carefully described as
> "uninitialized_var" and marked so as to avoid a warning. However
> if you trace the code it is passed into load_elf_interp and then
> this value is checked against NULL.
>
> As this return value isn't used this is actually safe but it freaks
> various analysis tools that see un-initialized memory addresses
> being read before their value is ever defined.
>
> Set it to NULL as a matter of programming good taste if nothing else
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index bf6d82b..5fb4801 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
>
> if (elf_interpreter) {
> - unsigned long uninitialized_var(interp_map_addr);
> + unsigned long interp_map_addr = 0;
>
> elf_entry = load_elf_interp(&loc->interp_elf_ex,
> interpreter,
That looks right to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists