linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: Clean the offlining CPU from the irq affinity mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:52:13 +0000
From:	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: Clean the offlining CPU from the irq
 affinity mask

> > +		} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->affinity))
> > +			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, data->affinity);
> >
> 
> You meant to use 'affinity' (instead of data->affinity) in the above 2 statements
> right? Note that we do chip->irq_set_affinity(data, affinity, true); further down.
> 

Yes, I have noticed it, used data->affinity here is just for avoiding compile warning.
in fact affinity == data->affinity, but affinity pointer is const type,
And cpumask_clear_cpu needs non-const type,so here I am using data->affinity,
instead of changing code "const struct cpumask *affinity;"