[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1209261810180.7072@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Ignore internal flags in cache creation
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Nack, this is already handled by CREATE_MASK in the mm/slab.c allocator;
>
> CREATE_MASK defines legal flags that can be specified. Other flags cause
> and error. This is about flags that are internal that should be ignored
> when specified.
>
That should be ignored for the mm/slab.c allocator, yes.
> I think it makes sense to reserve some top flags for internal purposes.
>
It depends on the implementation: if another slab allocator were to use
additional bits that would be a no-op with mm/slab.c, then this patch
would be too restrictive. There's also no requirement that any "internal
flags" reserved by a slab allocator implementation must be shared in the
same kmem_cache field as the flags passed to kmem_cache_create() -- it's
actually better if they aren't since they seldom need to be accessed in
the same cacheline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists