[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348724661.7059.124.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:44:21 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to
3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:09:28AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> but how does that affect pgbench and ilk that must spread regardless
> > of footprints.
>
> Well, how do you measure latency of the 1 process in the 1:N case? Maybe
> pipeline stalls of the 1 along with some way to recognize it is the 1 in
> the 1:N case.
Best is to let userland tell us it's critical. Smarts are expensive. A
class of it's own (my wakees do _not_ preempt me, and I don't care that
you think this is unfair to the unwashed masses who will otherwise
_starve_ without me feeding them) makes sense for these guys.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists