linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf/x86: Intel uncore_pmu_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5063ACDB.8090203@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:33:15 +0800
From:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf/x86: Intel uncore_pmu_to_box() local variable typo

On 09/25/2012 06:44 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't understand why the local variable box needs to
> be declared static here:
> 
> static struct intel_uncore_box *
> uncore_pmu_to_box(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
> {
>         static struct intel_uncore_box *box;
> 
>         box = *per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, cpu);
>         if (box)
>                 return box;
>         ....
> }
> 

My fault, sorry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/