linux-kernel - Re: [patch for-3.6] mm, thp: fix mapped pages avoiding unevictable list on mlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1209261852500.2303@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.6] mm, thp: fix mapped pages avoiding unevictable
 list on mlock

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> > Good catch, and the patch looks right to me, as far as it goes:
> > but does it go far enough?
> > 
> > I hesitate because it looks as if the NR_MLOCK zone page state is
> > maintained (with incs and decs) in ignorance of THP; so although
> > you will be correcting the Unevictable kB with your mlock_vma_page(),
> > the Mlocked kB just above it in /proc/meminfo would still be wrong?
> > 
> 
> Indeed, NR_MLOCK is a separate problem with regard to thp and it's 
> currently incremented once for every hugepage rather than HPAGE_PMD_NR.  
> mlock_vma_page() needs to increment by hpage_nr_pages(page) like 
> add_page_to_lru_list() does.
> 
> > I suppose I'm not sure whether this is material for late-3.6:
> > surely it's not a fix for a recent regression?
> > 
> 
> Ok, sounds good.  If there's no objection, I'd like to ask Andrew to apply 
> this to -mm and remove the cc to stable@...r.kernel.org since the 
> mlock_vma_page() problem above is separate and doesn't conflict with this 
> code, so I'll send a followup patch to address that.
> 
> Thanks!

Sounds right, certainly no objection from me, thanks for taking care of it.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/