linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] slub: move slub internal functions to its header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000013a08380e96-c8b9c80e-438a-46c6-b992-67bef9082a41-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:53:42 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] slub: move slub internal functions to its header

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

> The functions oo_order() and oo_objects() are used by the slub to
> determine respectively the order of a candidate allocation, and the
> number of objects made available from it. I would like a stable visible
> location outside slub.c so it can be acessed from slab_common.c.

Patch looks okay but it worries me that we export this internal stuff.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/