[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000601cd9cc9$100428c0$300c7a40$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:59:19 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: 'Thierry Reding' <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc: 'Michal Nazarewicz' <mina86@...a86.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: CMA broken in next-20120926
Hello,
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
> any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
> able to track the problem down, though.
>
> What I see is this during boot (with CMA_DEBUG enabled):
>
> [ 0.266904] cma: dma_alloc_from_contiguous(cma db474f80, count 64, align 6)
> [ 0.284469] cma: dma_alloc_from_contiguous(): memory range at c09d7000 is busy, retrying
> [ 0.293648] cma: dma_alloc_from_contiguous(): memory range at c09d7800 is busy, retrying
> ...
> [ 2.648619] DMA: failed to allocate 256 KiB pool for atomic coherent allocation
> ...
> [ 4.196193] WARNING: at /home/thierry.reding/src/kernel/linux-ipmp.git/arch/arm/mm/dma-
> mapping.c:485 __alloc_from_pool+0xdc/0x110()
> [ 4.207988] coherent pool not initialised!
>
> So the pool isn't getting initialized properly because CMA can't get at
> the memory. Do you have any hints as to what might be going on? If it's
> any help, I started seeing this with next-20120926 and it is in today's
> next as well.
Thanks for the report, I will check this issue asap.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists