[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1a9wb8iq1.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:43:18 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH scsi] Short the path length of scsi_cmd_to_driver()
>>>>> "Li" == Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> @@ -845,8 +844,11 @@ static int scsi_send_eh_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, unsigned char *cmnd,
>
> scsi_eh_restore_cmnd(scmd, &ses);
>
>- if (sdrv && sdrv->eh_action)
>- rtn = sdrv->eh_action(scmd, cmnd, cmnd_size, rtn);
>+ if (scmd->request->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_FS) {
>+ struct scsi_driver *sdrv = scsi_cmd_to_driver(scmd);
>+ if (sdrv->eh_action)
>+ rtn = sdrv->eh_action(scmd, cmnd, cmnd_size, rtn);
>+ }
>
> return rtn;
> }
My only concern is whether our device lifetime rules guarantee that the
ULD is always attached when we service an error handling command?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists